BE Civil Engineering (IOE, TU) Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) Question Paper 2078 Nepal
This is the official BE Civil Engineering (IOE, TU) Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) question paper for 2078, as set in the regular annual examination. It carries 80 full marks and a time allowance of 180 minutes, across 11 questions. On Kekkei you can attempt this Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) past paper online with a timer, get instant AI feedback and step-by-step solutions, and track the topics where you lose marks — completely free. Whether you are revising for your BE Civil Engineering (IOE, TU) Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) exam or solving previous years' question papers, this 2078 paper is a great way to practise under real exam conditions.
Section A: Long Answer Questions
Attempt all questions.
A propped cantilever of span is fixed at and simply supported (propped) at . It carries a uniformly distributed load of over the entire span. Flexural rigidity is constant.
Using the force method (method of consistent deformation), taking the prop reaction at as the redundant:
(a) Determine the vertical reaction at the prop .
(b) Determine the fixing moment at .
(c) Sketch and label the bending moment diagram, locating the point of maximum sagging moment and its magnitude.
Setup — choose redundant
The propped cantilever is statically indeterminate to the first degree. Release the prop reaction (vertical) as the redundant. The primary structure is a cantilever fixed at , free at .
Compatibility condition: the vertical deflection at in the released structure must be zero (because the prop prevents deflection):
Step 1 — Deflection at free end due to UDL (, downward positive)
For a cantilever with UDL over span :
Step 2 — Deflection at free end due to unit upward load at ()
For a cantilever with point load at the free end:
Step 3 — Apply compatibility (downward = positive)
Net deflection at :
Substitute , :
(a) Prop reaction
Step 4 — Reaction at (vertical equilibrium)
Total load .
Step 5 — Fixing moment at
Standard result (hogging). Verify by taking moments of all forces about :
Check: . ✓
(b) Fixing moment at
Step 6 — Bending moment diagram and maximum sagging moment
Measure from prop . Bending moment (sagging positive):
Maximum-moment location: from .
Point of contraflexure (M = 0): from (i.e. 2 m from A), plus at itself.
BMD (schematic):
A (-120 kN·m hogging)
|\
| \______ point of contraflexure at 6 m from B (2 m from A)
| \___
| sagging \___
| +67.5 max \___ B (0)
+------------------------+
x=3 m from B (peak sag)
(c) Hogging at , zero at , maximum sagging at from , point of contraflexure from .
A continuous beam has two spans: and . Support is fixed, is a simple support, and is a simple support. Span carries a uniformly distributed load of ; span carries a central point load of at its mid-point. is constant throughout.
Using the slope-deflection method:
(a) Compute the fixed-end moments.
(b) Write the slope-deflection equations and solve for the unknown rotations.
(c) Determine all the member-end moments.
Joints/unknowns: is fixed . is a simple end support. Unknown rotations: and . No sway. constant. (Clockwise member-end moment positive.)
Step 1 — Fixed-end moments (FEM)
Span (UDL, , ):
Span (central point load, , ):
Step 2 — Slope-deflection equations (, no sway)
Step 3 — Equilibrium / boundary conditions
At joint : . At end (simple support, no applied moment): .
From :
Joint :
Substitute :
From :
(b) , .
Step 4 — Member-end moments
Check joint B: ✓
(c) Final member-end moments:
| End | Moment (kN·m) |
|---|---|
| (hogging) | |
Analyse the continuous beam by the moment distribution method.
- Span , fixed at , carries a central point load .
- Span , simply supported at , carries a UDL .
- is constant.
(a) Compute the fixed-end moments.
(b) Compute the distribution factors at joint (use the modified stiffness for the far simply-supported end ).
(c) Carry out the moment distribution and report final end moments.
Step 1 — Fixed-end moments
Span (central point load): , .
Span (UDL): , .
Step 2 — Stiffness and distribution factors at B
Span : far end fixed stiffness .
Span : far end simply supported modified stiffness .
Total .
Step 3 — Release end C first. Because the modified stiffness assumes a pin at , first release : its unbalanced moment is removed, carrying over half to . Carry-over to : (we add the balancing of , which carries of the released moment). New , and .
Step 4 — Moment distribution table
| DF | — | 0.516 | 0.484 | — |
| FEM | -37.5 | +37.5 | -24.0 | +24.0 |
| Release C (CO to B) | -12.0 | -24.0 → 0 | ||
| Net at B | -37.5 | +37.5 | -36.0 | 0 |
| Unbalanced at B = | ||||
| Balance B () | ||||
| Carry-over to A | (none to C) | |||
| Final | -37.89 | +36.73 | -36.73 | 0 |
Step 5 — Check joint B equilibrium
(c) Final end moments
A plane truss consists of two members meeting at a common loaded joint. Member 1 runs from support to joint ; member 2 runs from support to joint . Coordinates (in metres): , , . Both members have axial rigidity . A vertical downward load of acts at joint . Supports and are pinned.
Using the matrix stiffness method (direct stiffness; only joint is free):
(a) Determine the lengths and direction cosines of each member.
(b) Assemble the reduced (free-DOF) global stiffness matrix at .
(c) Solve for the displacements at , then compute the axial force in each member.
Step 1 — Geometry (lengths & direction cosines)
Member 1, : . Direction cosines (A→C): , (vertical member).
Member 2, : . Direction cosines (B→C): , .
Step 2 — Member stiffness contributions at joint
Member 1: .
Member 2: , with , , :
Step 3 — Reduced global stiffness matrix (free DOFs )
Step 4 — Load vector and solve
. Solve .
.
(c) Displacements: , .
Step 5 — Axial forces (supports fixed).
Member 1 (): → 90 kN compression.
Member 2 (): .
Check joint vertical equilibrium: member 1 vertical carries kN (compression pushing up on ? no — member 1 from below carries kN that balances the kN downward load); member 2 carries . Equilibrium satisfied. ✓
Axial forces: , .
A fixed-base rectangular portal frame has columns and of height and a beam of span . The frame is fixed at and . A horizontal load is applied at beam level (joint ), and a vertical point load acts at the mid-span of the beam . All members have the same fully plastic moment .
Using plastic analysis (kinematic / mechanism method):
(a) Identify the possible collapse mechanisms (beam, sway, combined).
(b) Apply the virtual-work equation to each mechanism.
(c) Determine the value of required and identify the governing collapse mechanism.
Setup. Fixed-base portal, uniform . Possible plastic hinge locations: bases , ; corners , ; beam mid-span .
(a) Mechanisms: (1) Beam, (2) Sway, (3) Combined.
Mechanism 1 — Beam mechanism
Hinges at , , . Beam rotation at ends; mid-span deflection ; hinge at rotates . Internal work . External work .
Mechanism 2 — Sway mechanism
Hinges at , , , ; sway . Internal work . External work .
Mechanism 3 — Combined mechanism
Add beam + sway; the hinge at cancels (equal and opposite rotations). Remaining hinges: , , , . External work . Internal work . (Equivalently .)
(c) Governing mechanism
Required : beam , sway , combined . For the given loads the section must satisfy the largest required , so the combined mechanism governs.
(Equivalently, for a fixed the combined mechanism gives the lowest collapse load factor and hence governs collapse.)
Section B: Short Answer Questions
Attempt all questions.
Define static indeterminacy and kinematic indeterminacy. For a plane rigid-jointed portal frame with fixed bases (2 columns + 1 beam; 4 joints: two fixed supports and two rigid corner joints), compute the degree of static indeterminacy and the degree of kinematic indeterminacy (ignore axial deformation).
Definitions
- Static indeterminacy (): the number of unknown forces/reactions in excess of the available equations of static equilibrium; the number of redundant force quantities that must be released to render the structure statically determinate.
- Kinematic indeterminacy (): the number of independent unknown joint displacement components (degrees of freedom).
Static indeterminacy
For a plane rigid frame: (m members, r reaction components, j joints). Here , , (two fixed supports).
A single-bay single-storey fixed-base portal is a closed frame, confirming .
Kinematic indeterminacy (axial deformation neglected)
Free joints: , (bases fixed). Unknowns:
- Rotations , → 2.
- Translations: inextensible columns prevent vertical movement of , ; the inextensible beam forces and to share the same horizontal sway → 1 independent sway.
(If axial deformation is included, .)
State Clapeyron's theorem of three moments for a continuous beam with constant and no support settlement. Apply it to a two-span continuous beam (simply supported at and ) with , each span carrying a UDL , to find the moment at the interior support .
Theorem of three moments (Clapeyron), constant , no settlement
For three consecutive supports , , on spans , :
where are moment-area terms of the free (simply-supported) BMD of each span. For a span with UDL over length , .
Application
End supports simply supported . Equal spans , .
Explain the portal method of approximate analysis for building frames under lateral loads, stating its key assumptions. A single-bay, single-storey portal frame of total height carries a horizontal load of at roof level; both columns are identical. Using the portal method, find the shear and the base moment in each column.
Portal method — concept and assumptions
An approximate method for laterally-loaded building frames. Key assumptions:
- A point of contraflexure occurs at the mid-height of every column.
- A point of contraflexure occurs at the mid-span of every beam.
- Storey shear is shared so that each interior column carries twice the shear of an exterior column (shear proportional to bays supported).
Best suited to low-to-medium-rise frames where shear behaviour dominates.
Application — single bay (two exterior columns)
Total storey shear , resisted by 2 exterior columns; with only exterior columns the shear splits equally:
Inflection point at mid-height (). Base moment of each column:
The top-of-column moment is equal in magnitude () and opposite in sense, consistent with the mid-height inflection point.
A fixed beam of span with constant flexural rigidity undergoes a downward settlement of at support while remains at its level. No external transverse load acts. Determine the end moments induced at and due to the settlement.
Concept. For a fixed beam, a relative support settlement induces equal-magnitude end moments. From slope-deflection with and chord rotation :
so .
Numerical evaluation
, , :
With settling, the moment at is hogging and at is sagging; the beam takes an S-shape with a point of contraflexure at mid-span ().
Define shape factor and plastic moment capacity. Determine the shape factor of a rectangular cross-section of width and depth , and the fully plastic moment of a rectangular section (depth ) made of steel with yield stress .
Definitions
- Shape factor (): — the ratio of plastic moment to first-yield moment (equivalently plastic to elastic section modulus); a measure of reserve strength beyond first yield.
- Plastic moment capacity (): the moment at which the whole section has yielded, .
Shape factor of a rectangle
Elastic modulus ; plastic modulus (two half-areas each at lever arm : ).
Plastic moment of 200 × 300 mm section
:
Check: , and ✓
Write the element stiffness matrix for a prismatic beam element of length and flexural rigidity (DOFs: transverse displacement and rotation at each end; neglect axial and shear deformation). Then evaluate the leading stiffness coefficient (force at end 1 per unit transverse displacement at end 1) for and .
Beam element stiffness matrix (Euler–Bernoulli, 2 nodes × 2 DOF)
DOF order :
It is symmetric and singular (rigid-body translation and rotation give zero force).
Leading coefficient
(the shear force at end 1 for a unit transverse displacement there, other DOFs zero).
Numerical value (, , ):
(For reference , .)
Frequently asked questions
- Where can I find the BE Civil Engineering (IOE, TU) Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) question paper 2078?
- The full BE Civil Engineering (IOE, TU) Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) 2078 (regular) question paper is available free on Kekkei. You can read every question online and attempt the paper under timed exam conditions.
- Does the Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) 2078 paper come with solutions?
- Yes. Every question on this Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) past paper includes a step-by-step solution, plus instant AI feedback when you attempt it on Kekkei.
- How many marks is the BE Civil Engineering (IOE, TU) Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) 2078 paper?
- The BE Civil Engineering (IOE, TU) Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) 2078 paper carries 80 full marks and is meant to be completed in 180 minutes, across 11 questions.
- Is practising this Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) past paper free?
- Yes — reading and attempting this Theory of Structures II (IOE, CE 602) past paper on Kekkei is completely free.